Monthly Archives: April 2011

The Fascination of What’s Difficult

Most of what I read is (unfortunately?) discussion of US politics and economics, and when you read discussions of US politics and economics, or, I would guess, any politics and economics, you start to believe that the world is quite … Continue reading

Posted in politics | 1 Comment

The Exorcism of the Canucks **Updated

How did it come to this? How is Game 7 penciled in? What foe has driven the President’s Cup winners to the ropes, especially after being down and out? These Canucks are beating themselves and I’m led to ask why … Continue reading

Posted in hockey | 6 Comments

Empires and Empiricism

I think I will try another post on sort-of-anthropology, again with webcomics. Everyone loves anthropology posts! Right? Right? I can see your reaction now! So in my post on inequality, I alluded to the fact that some of the evidence given in the … Continue reading

Posted in history, science | 1 Comment

What I learned from attending anthropology seminars, or, why inequality?

For the past three-ish years I’ve off-and-on attended the IGERT (Integrated) Program in Evolutionary Mapping (IPEM) seminars to sort of get a taste for what science is like outside the world of physics, and also because human evolution is just something … Continue reading

Posted in history, science | 2 Comments

Re: worthwhile Canadian debate

Oh man, we’re really bound to get viewership with this exciting topic, eh? I was gonna comment on zuuko’s post, but my comment stretched out to about the length of the post, so here it goes on its own. I … Continue reading

Posted in politics | 4 Comments

Will the Hockey Gods smile on Vancouver?

Game 1 starts in 7 minutes. My inner Canucks fan: omg, omg, omg, omg… Are we going to be able to finish this time? We’ve disappointed so many times. NEED TO SCORE. My inner former Oilers fan: Calm the hell … Continue reading

Posted in hockey | 3 Comments

Worthwhile Canadian Debate *Updated

– I’m a big fan of the new debate format. A single question, followed by a 1-on-1 between two party leaders for 6(?) minutes and then broadened to a 4-way for another 6-minutes. The 1-on-1 allows real policy to be … Continue reading

Posted in politics | 2 Comments

Apropos of nothing

I had always kind of assumed that Martin Luther King Jr. was so celebrated because his cause was good, and wasn’t really interested in his particular opinions and statements. But I was reading this: http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html And I realised I should … Continue reading

Posted in history | 1 Comment

This paranoid’s future is here *Updated

I’m naturally a bit of a paranoid. Growing up when I was a teenager, I had to learn how to control it if I didn’t want to be that homeless guy on the street with the tinfoil hats. Mostly because, … Continue reading

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

Two Charts on Biking Safety

via Copenhagenize. The first chart details how cycling frequency is related to cycling risk. You see that where more people bike, biking is less risky. There are three possible explanations. The first one is that some places are just inherently … Continue reading

Posted in biking | 3 Comments