Musical guilty pleasures aren’t about guilt

They were caught listening to Backstreet Boys and now must cast down their heads in shame

I like both Matt Yglesias’ blog and his taste in music, and his distaste for the idea of “guilty pleasures” in music – even though I must say I do find Katy Perry pretty uniformly awful (as for Lily Allen, well, surely, everyone must love at least this song, right?). But he’s got at least one thing wrong here that I want to point out. The concept of “guilty pleasures” in music has nothing to do with the puritanical background of America. Because musical “guilty pleasures” – as opposed to say “guilty pleasures” in food – aren’t about guilt at all – they’re about shame. That’s why there’s a big deal about revealing them on the internet or something. I mean if you’re listening to “a guilty pleasure” and you just finished listening to it, you don’t feel bad at all – you feel great! The bad part comes when someone sees you listening to “Umbrella” or “Dragostea din tei” or whatever and makes fun of you. It’s a shame thing, that people try to shrug off by calling something “guilty pleasure”. Shame is a very strong motivator, but there’s nothing particularly puritanical or American about it – I would guess musical “guilty pleasures” are much more actual for Japanese cultural elitists, for example, than they are for American ones.

This entry was posted in music. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Musical guilty pleasures aren’t about guilt

  1. Pingback: Rated Zed

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s